Constructivism and Constructionism...Are They Different?
Constructivism and Constructionism are two theories that go hand in hand. They both focus on cognitive abilities and set out to build on students' knowledge and provide them with the tools to expand their knowledge and help them succeed. The theory of Constructionism was the brainchild of philosopher Jean Piaget. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in and can achieve at different stages of their development (Ackermann, 2002). He believed that children's way of thinking would evolve, and their worldly views will either change or stay the same. Constructivists believe that learners use their experience to construct a meaningful understanding of their learning (Laureate Education, 2015). Seymour Papert, who studied under Jean Piaget, emphasizes the importance of envisioning a better education experience by using tools and media. The use of these tools allows students to make sense of their world and find meaningfulness in their education (Ackermann, 2002). Although Papert believed in the cognitive portion of learning, he was more in tune with learning through making rather than the overall mental aspect. According to Orey, Constructionism should be considered both a learning theory and a learning strategy (2010). He says that when students collaborate with others and share their thoughts and understanding with their classmates, that is when the strategy/theory is most effective. Although Constructionism may focus more on utilizing tools and creating physical representations of what is learned, both approaches focus on the same thing, student-driven learning.
In
schools today, we use a variety of different tools to foster learning in the
classroom. One primary tool that is used is the use of game-based knowledge.
Children are so technologically savvy, and scores of apps have been developed
and released over the years. Technology is instrumental in Project-Based
Learning. With the development of different technologies, students can
role-play virtually, collaborate with peers and educators, and educators can
maximize instructional time and allow students to reach their learning goals
using other skills (Pitler et al., 2012). In my classroom, we use Kahoot to
build on and refresh our brains on what we already have learned. We also use
games like Minecraft, where the students can interact with Prodigy to make
learning fun. The Constructionism theory will tie in with the use of Genius
Hour and Hour of Code because it will allow students to build on their
knowledge by doing a project. PBL is valuable and important because it gives
students the opportunity to set their own goals and develop strategies using
different technologies to achieve those goals. By using PBL, students are able
to explore real-world issues, form meaningful relationships with their peers
through collaboration, investigate solutions, and deepen their knowledge on a
topic which allows them to further build on their knowledge (ISTE, 2016b).
Using Genius Hour and Hour of Code will allow students the opportunity to
choose what and how they are learning and allow for collaboration to showcase
what they have learned.
Both the
Constructionist and Constructivist learning theories offer unique ideas and
tools for engaging students. Both are beneficial and relevant to how our
students learn today. When students activate their prior knowledge, build on
it, and create something tangible, it makes for the most positive learning
environment. It is essential to teach students and have them develop a love of
education. Once they have that love, they are almost sure to succeed.
Reference
Ackermann, E. (2002, November 10). Piaget's Constructivism,
Papert's Constructionism: What's the difference? Retrieved from
https://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget _ Papert.pdf
International Society for Technology in Education. (2016b).
ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards/standards-for-students
Laureate Education (Producer). (2015). Constructionist and
constructivist learning theories [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Orey, M. (2010). Emerging perspectives on learning,
teaching, and technology. The Global Text Project.
http://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E.R., & Kuhn, M. (2012). Using
technology with classroom instruction that works (2nd edition). Alexandria, VA:
ASCD.
Comments
Post a Comment